Eric Maddox – June 30, 2023
If you know me, you would know that two of my favorite leadership books are "The Dichotomy of Leadership" and "Extreme Ownership." Authored by Jocko Willink and Leif Babin, these men delve into the concept of decentralized command and highlight its critical significance in leadership principles. I consider Jocko and Leif as my gurus and mentors in the realm of leadership knowledge and practices. Their profound insights have greatly shaped my understanding and appreciation of decentralized command as an essential component of effective leadership.
Decentralized command is a concept that involves distributing decision-making authority and operational control across various levels or entities within an organization or system. It delegates decision-making power and responsibility to lower levels, enabling greater autonomy and flexibility in responding to local conditions.
One of the primary advantages of decentralized command is its ability to facilitate faster and more agile decision-making. By empowering individuals closest to a situation or problem, they can make informed decisions in real-time without having to wait for approval from higher-ranking authorities. This is especially beneficial in dynamic and rapidly changing environments where swift responses are critical.
I personally experienced the value of decentralized command as a police officer, where I witnessed the significance of this leadership principle. In law enforcement, officers are trusted to make quick, sound, and critical decisions in fast-paced and ever-changing situations where immediate leadership availability may not be possible.
Decentralized command also encourages initiative and empowerment among frontline personnel. When individuals have the authority to make decisions and take action, they are more likely to be proactive and creative in problem-solving and adapting to new situations. This fosters innovation, enhances problem-solving capabilities, and improves overall organizational performance.
During my time as a field training officer, my goal was to cultivate "thinking" officers who had confidence in their decision-making processes and trusted that seeking approval for every incident or call for service was not always necessary.
Additionally, decentralized command enhances resilience and survivability. By dispersing decision-making authority among multiple individuals or units, the organization becomes less vulnerable to the loss of key leaders or communication breakdowns. If one part of the organization is incapacitated or cut off, other units can continue operating independently, maintaining overall effectiveness.
I have personally witnessed incidents where an officer, typically a rookie, encountered mental or physical roadblocks or even froze up. This can be highly detrimental, creating an unsafe environment from an officer safety standpoint and disrupting communication flow among on-scene units, especially in high-stakes incidents involving potential violence. In such situations, other officers were able to step up and make decisions, despite not necessarily holding a formal leadership role.
However, it is important to acknowledge that decentralized command is not suitable for every scenario. It requires clear communication channels, well-defined objectives, and a high degree of trust and competence among team members. Training and preparation may be necessary to ensure that individuals at lower levels possess the requisite skills and knowledge to make effective decisions.
Decentralized command offers the potential for greater agility, initiative, and resilience within organizations or systems. By empowering individuals at lower levels, it fosters adaptability and responsiveness, leading to improved performance and outcomes.